![]() ![]() Other tasks, most of them exotic or even esoteric. You should even write your own snippets of code. You should try to assemble many different scripts. But the fact is that to make it really competitive, you should invest hard. Moreover, it could somehow compete with modes IDE's. Believe me, after using vim or emacs for long time, you will totally miss its features in most advanced of IDEs. So, as for me, there are tree main areas of using emacs: Reading mail, querying database, reading pdf's - those are the most innocent of tasks I've seen to be "emacsificated". Great, great tool.īut as a true vim'er, I was always a bit frustrated with the fact that many emacsers are trying to use emacs literally everywhere, for literally all tasks. There's nothing wrong with emacs, it is indeed great tool. I don't wish to start a holy war, actually, there was a time when I've used emacs each second day (one day vim, one day emacs). For that, I much rather use any other editor (notepad++ or whatever) which does the job much better. This is painfully obvious when coding in a file containing multiple languages like html with javascript and php or something. And no, I don't want to learn elisp, thank you.Īlso, emacs don't really understand the semantics of the code. ![]() I have tried a couple of emacs modes but never got it to work right. Text editing is just fine, but when I'm writing code, I find myself wishing for functions like: goto definition, auto completion, refactoring, syntax hints, parameter docs etc etc (think Eclipse). And even there, I'd rather use lynx/elinks or mutt for that.Įmacs-the-programmers-editor has lost its touch as well. But, obviously, you cannot run Chrome in text mode so this is where emacs wins. Back in the days, I used gnus and the w3 browser, but clearly they are no longer up to it when compared to dedicated programs. I've been using emacs for the last 10 years (from and to), and I can only say that you are absolutely right. I'm a completely newbie, yet I have a strong gut feeling that Emacs-as-an-OS is obsolete.Įmacs experts, do you think that Emacs' choice to be a comprehensive environment is the right choice for 2010 and the future? Are there particular peripheral features that are still at or ahead of their time compared to alternatives? TECO is both a character-oriented text editor and an interpreted programming language for text. Emacs originally was an acronym for Editor MACroS, unifying the many TECO command sets and key bindings. for one of the above tasks, but other than regexps, I really see no reason to ever touch those side features. The original program was written in 1976 as a set of macros for an existing text editor called TECO. Sure, I might occasionally dip into Emacs to use regexps, etc. I would never use its built-in email the Gmail web interface has more relevant features like Priority Inbox.I would never use its dired feature Path Finder (Mac OS X) suits my needs.I would never use its built-in browser Chrome is years ahead.In a 2010 world, I just think that every side feature of Emacs is hopelessly behind dedicated software: I try to keep an open heart, but I find myself continally disagreeing with one core design choice: that Emacs allow its users to never have to leave. In an attempt to reach at least beginner status with such a legendary editor, I have been coding in Emacs for the last two months. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |